The Burden of Proof
The “Burden of Proof” is the notion that whomever is making a claim is also reliable for proving their own claim. A statement should be assumed false until a sufficient amount of evidence shows that the statement is indeed true.
If I were say that I am hiding a piece of candy behind my back, I shouldn’t expect anyone to believe me unless I bring my hand around to reveal the piece of candy. The Burden of Proof was on me; the one claiming to have the candy.
The reason that the “Burden of Proof” is important is because without it anyone could make-up any statement and have it assumed true. It would be up to everyone else to prove each statement false, before we could know which statements are actually true. I could say that there is a magic, invisible leprechaun living inside my house. No one can see it but me. I have no evidence of this leprechaun’s existence except for the fact that I believe it to be truly there. No one can prove that I am lying and that this allegation is completely false, therefore everyone should believe in my leprechaun until someone does somehow prove me false. -That would be nonsense. It should be up to me to present evidence of this leprechaun; and until I do, people should assume that I am delusional.
So then, why do I need to prove that God does not exist?
I am perfectly sane and reasonable for not believing in an invisible entity that is impossible to prove wrong. When someone makes a claim that a god exists, it is up to them to support their claim with real testable evidence. Until then, we can assume otherwise.







